Firefly III vs Crater Self-Hosted Invoicing

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted budgeting & finance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFirefly IIICrater Self-Hosted Invoicing
CategoryBudgeting & FinanceBudgeting & Finance
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPPHP
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, source
GitHub stars★ 24,254★ 1,784
First released20162023
ReplacesMint, YNABFreshBooks, Wave

Why pick each one

Choose Firefly III if…

  • Powerful budgeting features
  • Strong API for automation
Firefly III details

Choose Crater Self-Hosted Invoicing if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in PHP
Crater Self-Hosted Invoicing details

Frequently asked questions

Is Firefly III or Crater Self-Hosted Invoicing better?

Neither is universally better. Firefly III has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Firefly III and Crater Self-Hosted Invoicing free and open-source?

Yes. Firefly III is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Crater Self-Hosted Invoicing under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Firefly III and Crater Self-Hosted Invoicing with Docker?

Firefly III: yes. Crater Self-Hosted Invoicing: yes.

Related comparisons