Actual Budget vs Crater Self-Hosted Invoicing

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted budgeting & finance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureActual BudgetCrater Self-Hosted Invoicing
CategoryBudgeting & FinanceBudgeting & Finance
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptPHP
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, source
GitHub stars★ 28,019★ 1,784
First released20222023
ReplacesYNAB, MintFreshBooks, Wave

Why pick each one

Choose Actual Budget if…

  • Snappy offline-first experience
  • Privacy-focused sync
Actual Budget details

Choose Crater Self-Hosted Invoicing if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in PHP
Crater Self-Hosted Invoicing details

Frequently asked questions

Is Actual Budget or Crater Self-Hosted Invoicing better?

Actual Budget is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Crater Self-Hosted Invoicing if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Actual Budget and Crater Self-Hosted Invoicing free and open-source?

Yes. Actual Budget is licensed under MIT and Crater Self-Hosted Invoicing under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Actual Budget and Crater Self-Hosted Invoicing with Docker?

Actual Budget: yes. Crater Self-Hosted Invoicing: yes.

Related comparisons