Firecrawl vs Supercronic
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Firecrawl
Turn websites into clean data for AI applications
VS
Supercronic
Crontab-compatible job runner built for containers
| Feature | Firecrawl | Supercronic |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 162,961 | ★ 2,596 |
| First released | 2024 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Apify | cron |
Why pick each one
Choose Firecrawl if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 163k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Choose Supercronic if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.6k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Firecrawl or Supercronic better?
Neither is universally better. Firecrawl has the larger community, while Supercronic is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Firecrawl and Supercronic free and open-source?
Yes. Firecrawl is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Supercronic under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Firecrawl and Supercronic with Docker?
Firecrawl: yes. Supercronic: yes.