Activepieces vs Firecrawl
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Activepieces
Open-source no-code business automation
VS
Firecrawl
Turn websites into clean data for AI applications
| Feature | Activepieces | Firecrawl |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 23,620 | ★ 162,961 |
| First released | 2022 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Zapier, Make | Apify |
Why pick each one
Choose Activepieces if…
- Truly open-source license
- Friendly no-code UI
- Active development
Choose Firecrawl if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 163k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Activepieces or Firecrawl better?
Neither is universally better. Firecrawl has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Activepieces and Firecrawl free and open-source?
Yes. Activepieces is licensed under MIT and Firecrawl under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Activepieces and Firecrawl with Docker?
Activepieces: yes. Firecrawl: yes.