Files Sharing vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFiles SharingSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguagePHPGo
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 286★ 33,952
First released20252015
ReplacesAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Files Sharing if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in PHP
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Files Sharing details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Files Sharing or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Files Sharing is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Files Sharing and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Files Sharing is licensed under GPL-3.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Files Sharing and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Files Sharing: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons