File Browser vs Files Sharing

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserFiles Sharing
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageGoPHP
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 286
First released20172025
ReplacesDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose Files Sharing if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in PHP
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Files Sharing details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or Files Sharing better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Files Sharing if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and Files Sharing free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Files Sharing under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and Files Sharing with Docker?

File Browser: yes. Files Sharing: yes.

Related comparisons