FileGator vs Syncthing-Fork

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFileGatorSyncthing-Fork
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITMPL-2.0
LanguagePHPJava
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 3,048★ 2,534
First released20192017
ReplacesGoogle Drive, DropboxDropbox, Google Drive

Why pick each one

Choose FileGator if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3k GitHub stars)
FileGator details

Choose Syncthing-Fork if…

  • Actively maintained
  • No central server needed
Syncthing-Fork details

Frequently asked questions

Is FileGator or Syncthing-Fork better?

Neither is universally better. FileGator has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are FileGator and Syncthing-Fork free and open-source?

Yes. FileGator is licensed under MIT and Syncthing-Fork under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run FileGator and Syncthing-Fork with Docker?

FileGator: yes. Syncthing-Fork: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons