File Browser vs Zenko CloudServer

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserZenko CloudServer
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 1,936
First released20172026
ReplacesDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose Zenko CloudServer if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
Zenko CloudServer details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or Zenko CloudServer better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Zenko CloudServer if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and Zenko CloudServer free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Zenko CloudServer under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and Zenko CloudServer with Docker?

File Browser: yes. Zenko CloudServer: yes.

Related comparisons