File Browser vs Wingfit

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserWingfit
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0free
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, one-click
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 520
First released20172022
ReplacesDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose Wingfit if…

  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • One-click install on common self-host platforms
  • Written in TypeScript
Wingfit details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or Wingfit better?

Neither is universally better. File Browser has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are File Browser and Wingfit free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Wingfit under free. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and Wingfit with Docker?

File Browser: yes. Wingfit: yes.

Related comparisons