File Browser vs Pydio Cells Client

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserPydio Cells Client
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 32
First released20172019
ReplacesDropboxDropbox, Box

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose Pydio Cells Client if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Pydio Cells Client details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or Pydio Cells Client better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Pydio Cells Client if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and Pydio Cells Client free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Pydio Cells Client under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and Pydio Cells Client with Docker?

File Browser: yes. Pydio Cells Client: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons