File Browser vs Sharry

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserSharry
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageGoElm
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 1,338
First released20172025
ReplacesDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose Sharry if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Elm
Sharry details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or Sharry better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Sharry if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and Sharry free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Sharry under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and Sharry with Docker?

File Browser: yes. Sharry: yes.

Related comparisons