File Browser vs Send

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserSend
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0MPL-2.0
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 5,847
First released20172020
ReplacesDropboxWeTransfer, Firefox Send

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose Send if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 5.8k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
Send details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or Send better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Send if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and Send free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Send under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and Send with Docker?

File Browser: yes. Send: yes.

Related comparisons