File Browser vs qrcp

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile Browserqrcp
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 10,491
First released20172018
ReplacesDropboxAirDrop, Snapdrop

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose qrcp if…

  • Instant phone transfers
  • Zero configuration
qrcp details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or qrcp better?

Neither is universally better. File Browser has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are File Browser and qrcp free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and qrcp under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and qrcp with Docker?

File Browser: yes. qrcp: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons