File Browser vs PicoShare

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserPicoShare
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 2,971
First released20172021
ReplacesDropboxDropbox, WeTransfer

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose PicoShare if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3k GitHub stars)
PicoShare details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or PicoShare better?

Neither is universally better. File Browser has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are File Browser and PicoShare free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and PicoShare under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and PicoShare with Docker?

File Browser: yes. PicoShare: yes.

Related comparisons