File Browser vs PhotoPrism

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserPhotoPrism
CategoryFile Sync & StoragePhoto Management
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 40,046
First released20172018
ReplacesDropboxGoogle Photos

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose PhotoPrism if…

  • Strong local AI features
  • Great RAW support
  • Polished UI
PhotoPrism details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or PhotoPrism better?

Neither is universally better. PhotoPrism has the larger community, while File Browser is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are File Browser and PhotoPrism free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and PhotoPrism under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and PhotoPrism with Docker?

File Browser: yes. PhotoPrism: yes.

Related comparisons