File Browser vs pgBackRest

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserpgBackRest
CategoryFile Sync & StorageBackup & Recovery
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoC
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 4,296
First released20172013
ReplacesDropboxVeeam

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose pgBackRest if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (4.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C
pgBackRest details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or pgBackRest better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider pgBackRest if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and pgBackRest free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and pgBackRest under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and pgBackRest with Docker?

File Browser: yes. pgBackRest: yes.

Related comparisons