File Browser vs OpenCloud Files

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserOpenCloud Files
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 2,083
First released20172020
ReplacesDropboxDropbox, Google Drive

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose OpenCloud Files if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.1k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
OpenCloud Files details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or OpenCloud Files better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider OpenCloud Files if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and OpenCloud Files free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and OpenCloud Files under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and OpenCloud Files with Docker?

File Browser: yes. OpenCloud Files: yes.

Related comparisons