File Browser vs imaginary

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile Browserimaginary
CategoryFile Sync & StoragePhoto Management
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 6,076
First released20172015
ReplacesDropboxCloudinary, imgix

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose imaginary if…

  • Very fast processing
  • Easy to scale
imaginary details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or imaginary better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider imaginary if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and imaginary free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and imaginary under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and imaginary with Docker?

File Browser: yes. imaginary: yes.

Related comparisons