File Browser vs Gossa

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserGossa
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybare-metal
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 1,101
First released20172024
ReplacesDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose Gossa if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Active community (1.1k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Gossa details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or Gossa better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Gossa if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and Gossa free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Gossa under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and Gossa with Docker?

File Browser: yes. Gossa: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons