File Browser vs gohttpserver

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile Browsergohttpserver
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB32 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 2,843
First released20172016
ReplacesDropboxDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose gohttpserver if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.8k GitHub stars)
gohttpserver details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or gohttpserver better?

Neither is universally better. File Browser has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are File Browser and gohttpserver free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and gohttpserver under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and gohttpserver with Docker?

File Browser: yes. gohttpserver: yes.

Related comparisons