File Browser vs gallery-dl

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile Browsergallery-dl
CategoryFile Sync & StoragePhoto Management
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-2.0
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybare-metal, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 19,143
First released20172015
ReplacesDropboxManual downloads

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose gallery-dl if…

  • Supports hundreds of sites
  • Very actively maintained
gallery-dl details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or gallery-dl better?

Neither is universally better. File Browser has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are File Browser and gallery-dl free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and gallery-dl under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and gallery-dl with Docker?

File Browser: yes. gallery-dl: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons