File Browser vs Filestash

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserFilestash
CategoryFile Sync & StorageDocument Management
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 14,451
First released20172017
ReplacesDropboxDropbox, SharePoint

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose Filestash if…

  • Unifies access to many backends
  • Easy deployment
Filestash details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or Filestash better?

Neither is universally better. File Browser has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are File Browser and Filestash free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Filestash under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and Filestash with Docker?

File Browser: yes. Filestash: yes.

Related comparisons