FileBrowser Quantum vs Nextcloud All-in-One
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FileBrowser Quantum
Enhanced web file manager fork with extra features
VS
Nextcloud All-in-One
Containerized turnkey Nextcloud deployment
| Feature | FileBrowser Quantum | Nextcloud All-in-One |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,695 | ★ 10,238 |
| First released | 2024 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Google Drive, Dropbox | Dropbox, Google Drive |
Why pick each one
Choose FileBrowser Quantum if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 7.7k GitHub stars
Choose Nextcloud All-in-One if…
- Much simpler than manual setup
- Backup and update built in
- Officially supported
Frequently asked questions
Is FileBrowser Quantum or Nextcloud All-in-One better?
Neither is universally better. Nextcloud All-in-One has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are FileBrowser Quantum and Nextcloud All-in-One free and open-source?
Yes. FileBrowser Quantum is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Nextcloud All-in-One under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FileBrowser Quantum and Nextcloud All-in-One with Docker?
FileBrowser Quantum: yes. Nextcloud All-in-One: yes.