fiche vs lesma
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
fiche
Terminal pastebin server powered by netcat
VS
lesma
Simple paste app friendly with browser and command line
| Feature | fiche | lesma |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | C | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,547 | ★ 8 |
| First released | 2015 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Pastebin.com, termbin | — |
Why pick each one
Choose fiche if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
Choose lesma if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Rust
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is fiche or lesma better?
fiche is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider lesma if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are fiche and lesma free and open-source?
Yes. fiche is licensed under MIT and lesma under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run fiche and lesma with Docker?
fiche: check the project docs for container support. lesma: yes.