fgallery vs Thumbor
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
fgallery
Minimalist static photo gallery generator
VS
Thumbor
A smart imaging service and enables on-demand cropping, resizing,
| Feature | fgallery | Thumbor |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 251 | ★ 10,510 |
| First released | 2013 | 2025 |
| Replaces | Flickr, Google Photos | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Thumbor if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 10.5k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is fgallery or Thumbor better?
Neither is universally better. Thumbor has the larger community, while fgallery is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are fgallery and Thumbor free and open-source?
Yes. fgallery is licensed under MIT and Thumbor under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run fgallery and Thumbor with Docker?
fgallery: check the project docs for container support. Thumbor: yes.