Feber vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFeberPuter
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM50 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 43,003
First released20242026
Replaces

Why pick each one

Choose Feber if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Feber details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is Feber or Puter better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community, while Feber is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Feber and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. Feber is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Feber and Puter with Docker?

Feber: check the project docs for container support. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons