Faircamp vs Grav
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Faircamp
A static site generator for audio artists and producers
VS
Grav
Fast flat-file CMS with no database required
| Feature | Faircamp | Grav |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | AGPL-3.0-or-later | MIT |
| Language | PHP | |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | — | ★ 15,620 |
| First released | 2024 | 2014 |
| Replaces | — | WordPress, Squarespace |
Why pick each one
Choose Faircamp if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0-or-later license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Faircamp or Grav better?
Neither is universally better. Grav has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Faircamp and Grav free and open-source?
Yes. Faircamp is licensed under AGPL-3.0-or-later and Grav under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Faircamp and Grav with Docker?
Faircamp: check the project docs for container support. Grav: yes.