ExpenseOwl vs Firefly III

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted budgeting & finance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureExpenseOwlFirefly III
CategoryBudgeting & FinanceBudgeting & Finance
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageHTMLPHP
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 1,475★ 24,254
First released20242016
ReplacesMint, SpendeeMint, YNAB

Why pick each one

Choose ExpenseOwl if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Fast and simple
ExpenseOwl details

Choose Firefly III if…

  • Powerful budgeting features
  • Strong API for automation
Firefly III details

Frequently asked questions

Is ExpenseOwl or Firefly III better?

Neither is universally better. Firefly III has the larger community, while ExpenseOwl is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are ExpenseOwl and Firefly III free and open-source?

Yes. ExpenseOwl is licensed under MIT and Firefly III under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run ExpenseOwl and Firefly III with Docker?

ExpenseOwl: yes. Firefly III: yes.

Related comparisons