exifr vs Memories
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
exifr
Fast JavaScript EXIF and metadata reader for photos
VS
Memories
Photo management app for Nextcloud with timeline and AI
| Feature | exifr | Memories |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Vue |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,245 | ★ 3,816 |
| First released | 2019 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Commercial metadata APIs | Google Photos, iCloud Photos |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is exifr or Memories better?
Neither is universally better. Memories has the larger community, while exifr is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are exifr and Memories free and open-source?
Yes. exifr is licensed under MIT and Memories under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run exifr and Memories with Docker?
exifr: check the project docs for container support. Memories: yes.