ExifCleaner vs Memories
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ExifCleaner
Cross-platform tool to remove metadata from images
VS
Memories
Photo management app for Nextcloud with timeline and AI
| Feature | ExifCleaner | Memories |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Perl | Vue |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,552 | ★ 3,816 |
| First released | 2019 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Online metadata removers | Google Photos, iCloud Photos |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is ExifCleaner or Memories better?
Neither is universally better. Memories has the larger community, while ExifCleaner is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are ExifCleaner and Memories free and open-source?
Yes. ExifCleaner is licensed under MIT and Memories under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ExifCleaner and Memories with Docker?
ExifCleaner: check the project docs for container support. Memories: yes.