EveryDocs vs Signature PDF
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
EveryDocs
Simple Document Management System for private use with basic
VS
Signature PDF
Sign and manipulate PDFs with collaboration, organization, compression
| Feature | EveryDocs | Signature PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Ruby | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 399 | ★ 818 |
| First released | 2019 | 2025 |
| Replaces | — | — |
Why pick each one
Choose EveryDocs if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Ruby
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Signature PDF if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is EveryDocs or Signature PDF better?
Neither is universally better. Signature PDF has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are EveryDocs and Signature PDF free and open-source?
Yes. EveryDocs is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Signature PDF under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run EveryDocs and Signature PDF with Docker?
EveryDocs: yes. Signature PDF: yes.