EveryDocs vs Open Semantic Search
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
EveryDocs
Simple Document Management System for private use with basic
VS
Open Semantic Search
Search engine and text mining for document archives
| Feature | EveryDocs | Open Semantic Search |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Ruby | Shell |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 399 | ★ 1,198 |
| First released | 2019 | 2014 |
| Replaces | — | DocuWare, M-Files |
Why pick each one
Choose EveryDocs if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Ruby
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Open Semantic Search if…
- Powerful analytics on archives
- Handles many file formats
Frequently asked questions
Is EveryDocs or Open Semantic Search better?
Neither is universally better. Open Semantic Search has the larger community, while EveryDocs is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are EveryDocs and Open Semantic Search free and open-source?
Yes. EveryDocs is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Open Semantic Search under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run EveryDocs and Open Semantic Search with Docker?
EveryDocs: yes. Open Semantic Search: yes.