evcc vs Mushroom

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureevccMushroom
CategoryHome AutomationHome Automation
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB32 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarysource
GitHub stars★ 7,054★ 5,098
First released20192022
ReplacesSmartThingsproprietary smart home apps

Why pick each one

Choose evcc if…

  • Maximizes solar self-use
  • Wide hardware support
  • Lightweight
evcc details

Choose Mushroom if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Mushroom details

Frequently asked questions

Is evcc or Mushroom better?

Neither is universally better. evcc has the larger community, while Mushroom is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are evcc and Mushroom free and open-source?

Yes. evcc is licensed under MIT and Mushroom under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run evcc and Mushroom with Docker?

evcc: yes. Mushroom: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons