evcc vs ioBroker
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
evcc
Solar-aware electric vehicle charging controller
VS
ioBroker
Integration platform for the Internet of Things
| Feature | evcc | ioBroker |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Home Automation | Home Automation |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Shell |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,054 | ★ 1,373 |
| First released | 2019 | 2014 |
| Replaces | SmartThings | SmartThings, Hubitat |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is evcc or ioBroker better?
Neither is universally better. evcc has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are evcc and ioBroker free and open-source?
Yes. evcc is licensed under MIT and ioBroker under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run evcc and ioBroker with Docker?
evcc: yes. ioBroker: yes.