eturnal vs La Suite - Meet
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video conferencing options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
eturnal
STUN and TURN server for real-time applications
VS
La Suite - Meet
Simple and Secure Video Conferencing
| Feature | eturnal | La Suite - Meet |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Conferencing | Video Conferencing |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Erlang | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 200 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 340 | ★ 2,212 |
| First released | 2020 | 2025 |
| Replaces | Twilio STUN/TURN | BigBlueButton, Jitsi, Microsoft Teams |
Why pick each one
Choose eturnal if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Erlang
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose La Suite - Meet if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Active community (2.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 200 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is eturnal or La Suite - Meet better?
Neither is universally better. La Suite - Meet has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are eturnal and La Suite - Meet free and open-source?
Yes. eturnal is licensed under Apache-2.0 and La Suite - Meet under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run eturnal and La Suite - Meet with Docker?
eturnal: yes. La Suite - Meet: check the project docs for container support.