Etherpad vs SIPCAPTURE Homer

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureEtherpadSIPCAPTURE Homer
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 18,481★ 2,004
First released20112026
ReplacesGoogle Docs

Why pick each one

Choose Etherpad if…

  • Very mature and stable
  • Highly extensible
Etherpad details

Choose SIPCAPTURE Homer if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
SIPCAPTURE Homer details

Frequently asked questions

Is Etherpad or SIPCAPTURE Homer better?

Neither is universally better. Etherpad has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Etherpad and SIPCAPTURE Homer free and open-source?

Yes. Etherpad is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SIPCAPTURE Homer under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Etherpad and SIPCAPTURE Homer with Docker?

Etherpad: yes. SIPCAPTURE Homer: yes.

Related comparisons