Etherpad vs Session

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureEtherpadSession
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcebare-metal, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 18,481★ 546
First released20112020
ReplacesGoogle DocsSignal, WhatsApp, Telegram

Why pick each one

Choose Etherpad if…

  • Very mature and stable
  • Highly extensible
Etherpad details

Choose Session if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Session details

Frequently asked questions

Is Etherpad or Session better?

Neither is universally better. Etherpad has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Etherpad and Session free and open-source?

Yes. Etherpad is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Session under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Etherpad and Session with Docker?

Etherpad: yes. Session: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons