Etherpad vs Robust IRC

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureEtherpadRobust IRC
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseApache-2.0BSD-3-Clause
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcebare-metal
GitHub stars★ 18,481★ 195
First released20112020
ReplacesGoogle Docs

Why pick each one

Choose Etherpad if…

  • Very mature and stable
  • Highly extensible
Etherpad details

Choose Robust IRC if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Written in Go
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Robust IRC details

Frequently asked questions

Is Etherpad or Robust IRC better?

Neither is universally better. Etherpad has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Etherpad and Robust IRC free and open-source?

Yes. Etherpad is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Robust IRC under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Etherpad and Robust IRC with Docker?

Etherpad: yes. Robust IRC: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons