Etherpad vs matrix-appservice-irc
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Etherpad
Real-time collaborative document editor
VS
matrix-appservice-irc
Bridge connecting Matrix rooms to IRC channels
| Feature | Etherpad | matrix-appservice-irc |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 18,481 | ★ 505 |
| First released | 2011 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Google Docs | Slack IRC gateway |
Why pick each one
Choose matrix-appservice-irc if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in TypeScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Etherpad or matrix-appservice-irc better?
Etherpad is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider matrix-appservice-irc if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Etherpad and matrix-appservice-irc free and open-source?
Yes. Etherpad is licensed under Apache-2.0 and matrix-appservice-irc under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Etherpad and matrix-appservice-irc with Docker?
Etherpad: yes. matrix-appservice-irc: yes.