Etherpad vs FusionPBX

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureEtherpadFusionPBX
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseApache-2.0MPL-1.1
LanguageTypeScriptPHP
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcebare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 18,481★ 1,038
First released20112013
ReplacesGoogle Docs3CX, RingCentral

Why pick each one

Choose Etherpad if…

  • Very mature and stable
  • Highly extensible
Etherpad details

Choose FusionPBX if…

  • Released under the MPL-1.1 license
  • Active community (1k GitHub stars)
  • Written in PHP
FusionPBX details

Frequently asked questions

Is Etherpad or FusionPBX better?

Etherpad is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider FusionPBX if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Etherpad and FusionPBX free and open-source?

Yes. Etherpad is licensed under Apache-2.0 and FusionPBX under MPL-1.1. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Etherpad and FusionPBX with Docker?

Etherpad: yes. FusionPBX: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons