Eternal Terminal vs NetBird

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureEternal TerminalNetBird
CategoryRemote Access & VPNRemote Access & VPN
LicenseApache-2.0BSD-3-Clause
LanguageC++Go
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binarydocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 3,839★ 28,139
First released20162021
ReplacesMoshTailscale, ZeroTier

Why pick each one

Choose Eternal Terminal if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++
Eternal Terminal details

Choose NetBird if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 28.1k GitHub stars
NetBird details

Frequently asked questions

Is Eternal Terminal or NetBird better?

Neither is universally better. NetBird has the larger community, while Eternal Terminal is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Eternal Terminal and NetBird free and open-source?

Yes. Eternal Terminal is licensed under Apache-2.0 and NetBird under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Eternal Terminal and NetBird with Docker?

Eternal Terminal: check the project docs for container support. NetBird: yes.

Related comparisons