ERPNext vs PartKeepr
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted crm & business apps options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ERPNext
Open-source ERP for growing businesses
VS
PartKeepr
Inventory management for electronic parts
| Feature | ERPNext | PartKeepr |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CRM & Business Apps | CRM & Business Apps |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 37,773 | ★ 1,530 |
| First released | 2010 | 2012 |
| Replaces | SAP, NetSuite, Salesforce | NetSuite |
Why pick each one
Choose PartKeepr if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is ERPNext or PartKeepr better?
Neither is universally better. ERPNext has the larger community, while PartKeepr is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are ERPNext and PartKeepr free and open-source?
Yes. ERPNext is licensed under GPL-3.0 and PartKeepr under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ERPNext and PartKeepr with Docker?
ERPNext: yes. PartKeepr: yes.