EpubPress vs Wallabag
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
EpubPress
Convert web articles into self-hosted ebooks
VS
Wallabag
Self-hosted read-it-later application
| Feature | EpubPress | Wallabag |
|---|---|---|
| Category | E-books & Media Library | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 337 | ★ 12,884 |
| First released | 2015 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Pocket, Instapaper | Pocket, Instapaper |
Why pick each one
Choose EpubPress if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Wallabag if…
- Great read-it-later experience
- Own your reading list
- Apps available
Frequently asked questions
Is EpubPress or Wallabag better?
Neither is universally better. Wallabag has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are EpubPress and Wallabag free and open-source?
Yes. EpubPress is licensed under MIT and Wallabag under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run EpubPress and Wallabag with Docker?
EpubPress: yes. Wallabag: yes.