Ente Photos vs Sigal
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Ente Photos
End-to-end encrypted photo storage and backup
VS
Sigal
Simple static photo gallery generator written in Python
| Feature | Ente Photos | Sigal |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Dart | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 28,201 | ★ 942 |
| First released | 2022 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Google Photos, iCloud Photos | Flickr |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Ente Photos or Sigal better?
Neither is universally better. Ente Photos has the larger community, while Sigal is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Ente Photos and Sigal free and open-source?
Yes. Ente Photos is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Sigal under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Ente Photos and Sigal with Docker?
Ente Photos: yes. Sigal: check the project docs for container support.