Ente Photos vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureEnte PhotosSeaweedFS
CategoryPhoto ManagementFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageDartGo
Setup difficultyHardHard
Min. RAM1,024 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 28,201★ 33,952
First released20222015
ReplacesGoogle Photos, iCloud PhotosAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Ente Photos if…

  • Strong encryption
  • Polished apps
  • Privacy-first
Ente Photos details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Ente Photos or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Ente Photos and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Ente Photos is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Ente Photos and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Ente Photos: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons