Ente Photos vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureEnte PhotosPuter
CategoryPhoto ManagementFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageDartTypeScript
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker
GitHub stars★ 28,201★ 43,003
First released20222026
ReplacesGoogle Photos, iCloud Photos

Why pick each one

Choose Ente Photos if…

  • Strong encryption
  • Polished apps
  • Privacy-first
Ente Photos details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is Ente Photos or Puter better?

Puter is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Ente Photos if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Ente Photos and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. Ente Photos is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Ente Photos and Puter with Docker?

Ente Photos: yes. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons