Ente Photos vs Mediagoblin
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Ente Photos
End-to-end encrypted photo storage and backup
VS
Mediagoblin
Media publishing platform that anyone can run (alternative to Flickr,
| Feature | Ente Photos | Mediagoblin |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Dart | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 28,201 | — |
| First released | 2022 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Google Photos, iCloud Photos | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Mediagoblin if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Written in Python
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Ente Photos or Mediagoblin better?
Neither is universally better. Ente Photos has the larger community, while Mediagoblin is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Ente Photos and Mediagoblin free and open-source?
Yes. Ente Photos is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Mediagoblin under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Ente Photos and Mediagoblin with Docker?
Ente Photos: yes. Mediagoblin: check the project docs for container support.