Enchanted vs LiteLLM
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted local llm runners options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Enchanted
Native Ollama client for iOS and macOS
VS
LiteLLM
Unified proxy and gateway for 100+ LLM APIs
| Feature | Enchanted | LiteLLM |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Local LLM Runners | Local LLM Runners |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Swift | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | binary | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,983 | ★ 55,843 |
| First released | 2024 | 2023 |
| Replaces | ChatGPT | OpenRouter |
Why pick each one
Choose Enchanted if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 6k GitHub stars
- Written in Swift
Choose LiteLLM if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 55.8k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Enchanted or LiteLLM better?
Neither is universally better. LiteLLM has the larger community, while Enchanted is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Enchanted and LiteLLM free and open-source?
Yes. Enchanted is licensed under Apache-2.0 and LiteLLM under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Enchanted and LiteLLM with Docker?
Enchanted: check the project docs for container support. LiteLLM: yes.