Enchanted vs exo
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted local llm runners options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Enchanted
Native Ollama client for iOS and macOS
VS
exo
Run your own AI cluster across everyday devices
| Feature | Enchanted | exo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Local LLM Runners | Local LLM Runners |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Swift | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 8,192 MB |
| Deployment | binary | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,983 | ★ 46,708 |
| First released | 2024 | 2024 |
| Replaces | ChatGPT | OpenAI API |
Why pick each one
Choose Enchanted if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 6k GitHub stars
- Written in Swift
Choose exo if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Mature project with 46.7k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Enchanted or exo better?
Neither is universally better. exo has the larger community, while Enchanted is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Enchanted and exo free and open-source?
Yes. Enchanted is licensed under Apache-2.0 and exo under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Enchanted and exo with Docker?
Enchanted: check the project docs for container support. exo: check the project docs for container support.