RainLoop vs Roundcube
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
RainLoop
Simple, modern and fast web-based email client
VS
Roundcube
Browser-based IMAP webmail client
| Feature | RainLoop | Roundcube |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,120 | ★ 7,118 |
| First released | 2013 | 2008 |
| Replaces | Gmail, Outlook Web | Gmail, Outlook Web |
Why pick each one
Choose RainLoop if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.1k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is RainLoop or Roundcube better?
Neither is universally better. Roundcube has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are RainLoop and Roundcube free and open-source?
Yes. RainLoop is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Roundcube under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run RainLoop and Roundcube with Docker?
RainLoop: yes. Roundcube: yes.